On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:19:36AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:35:08PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > In order to identify architectures I need to find a uniq id for every > > possibilities (for pkgng) > > > > here is the identification I propose: > > > > arch-class-os-majorversion(-archi_specific_extension) > > > > arch can be one of the following: > > > > - x86 for i386 and amd64 (discussed with kib) > > - powerpc for powerpc and powerpc64 > > - arm > > - mips > > - sparc > > > > class may be: > > - 32 bits > > - 64 bits > > > > os will always be freebsd :) (lower case) > > > > majorversion the freebsd major version (10 9 8) > > > > achi_specific_extension currently only mips and arm are concerned, > > for arm could be: > > el_oabi > > eb_oabi > > el_eabi > > eb_eabi > > > > (I don't know how to get arm version or hardfp/softfp from the elf) > > > > for mips I don't know much. > > > > for ia64, I have strictly no idea what I should set. > > > > Everything is read from the elf file > > > > for example: > > x86-64-freebsd-10 > > x86-32-freebsd-8 > > arm-32-freebsd-10-el_oabi > > > > Please help me to improve this to get the better identification to have the best > > possible to determine which package can be installed where. > > > > while proposing information please tell me how to get the information > > (dynamically) > > > > regards, > > Bapt > > Another question (by rwatson) that comes here is should we keep the architecture > names that freebsd uses to avoid confusion or should we try to use more accurate > names? > > powerpc-64-freebsd-9 -> powerpc64-64-freebsd-9 > x86-32-freebsd-9 -> i386-32-freebsd-9 > x86-64-freebsd-9 -> amd64-64-freebsd-9 i386-32 and amd64-64 is weird and confusing. IMO, you should go either with x86-{32,64} names, or with i386/amd64, not with a mix. > etc. > > An example of implementation can be find here: > https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/blob/master/libpkg/pkg_elf.c#L157 > > PS: Feel free to submit fixes/improvements to the code :) > > regards, > Bapt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:25 UTC