on 20/03/2012 16:39 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 07:20:52AM -0500, Chuck Burns wrote: >> We should probably pad the version number, and shorten things up.. >> similar to: >> >> package-1.2-fbsd09.1-x86.pkg >> package-1.2-fbsd09.1-x64.pkg >> package-1.2-fbsd09.1-ppc.pkg >> package-1.2-fbsd09.1-ppc64.pkg >> package-1.2-fbsd09.1-arm.pkg >> >> For app "Package" version 1.2, on FreeBSD 9.1 >> drop the .1 for .0 versions. >> >> The reason for the padding is to help with sorting, at least until >> freebsd 100.0 comes out. :P >> >> Chuck Burns >> > > I'm not on changing the package name, this information will be in the manifest. > > the packagename will remain name-version.txz So no plans for cross-arch package repos? :) IMO, it could be useful to reflect arch metadata in the package name. BTW, some packaging systems also have a "noarch" indicator for packages that contain purely stuff like documentation or images (or shell scripts, etc). -- Andriy GaponReceived on Tue Mar 20 2012 - 14:18:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:25 UTC