26.03.2012 03:25, Tim Kientzle пишет: > > On Mar 25, 2012, at 2:43 PM, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: > >> On (25/03/2012 10:53), Tim Kientzle wrote: >>> >>> On Mar 25, 2012, at 5:53 AM, Boris Samorodov wrote: >>> >>>> On 24.03.2012 21:00, Tim Kientzle wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Mar 23, 2012, at 9:51 PM, Boris Samorodov wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Can you send me the output of: >>>>> >>>>> tar -cvf /tmp/test.tar /usr/ports/devel/nspr/work/nspr-4.9/mozilla/nsprpub/build/dist/lib/../../pr/src/./libnspr4.so.1 >>>>> >>>>> (A tar archive containing only that one source file.) >>>>> >>>>> This looks similar to a bug that we found in libarchive recently >>>>> I didn't think that bug impacted FreeBSD, but I may have been >>>>> wrong…. if it did, it will be obvious from the structure of the >>>>> created archive. >>>> >>>> The following file is extracted after tarring: >>>> ----- >>>> % hd libnspr4.so.1 >>>> 00000000 32 0a 30 0a 30 0a 32 34 31 39 37 31 0a 30 0a 00 |2.0.0.241971.0..| >>>> 00000010 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| >>>> * >>>> 00000200 >>>> ----- >>>> >>>> The tar file itself attached (3KB in length). >>> >>> Ugh. I'll probably need your help to diagnose this more precisely. >>> >>> Here is the root problem: tar thinks this is a sparse file >>> with nothing in it. On FreeBSD, bsdtar now uses >>> lseek(SEEK_HOLE) to identify holes in the file. For >>> some reason, bsdtar is storing this file as just one big hole. >> >> I experience a related issue. lseek(SEEK_HOLE) error checks are too >> strict. Files are not added to archive if lseek(SEEK_HOLE) fails. >> Ignoring lseek(SEEK_HOLE) at least in ENOTTY case would be preferable. > > This has already been fixed upstream. I'll get the > fix merged soon… > > Boris: What filesystem are you using? zfs -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To ServeReceived on Mon Mar 26 2012 - 06:04:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:25 UTC