On 03/31/12 07:57, Kaho Toshikazu wrote: >> Could you collect more information about what's exactly happens >> with the device? Can you execute some camcontrol inquiry or >> camcontrol readcap commands after kernel misdetected size with >> "READ CAPACITY(16)"? >> >> If yes (device is still alive), could you run these commands >> (with proper device name) and send me the output files: >> camcontrol cmd da0 -E -v -c "12 00 00 00 80 00" -i 128 -> INQ.res >> camcontrol cmd da0 -E -v -c "9e 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >> 00 20 00 00" -i 32 -> RC16.result > > usbconfig -d 0.3 dump_device_desc > > ugen0.3:<Mass Storage Device JetFlash> at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON > > bLength = 0x0012 > bDescriptorType = 0x0001 > bcdUSB = 0x0200 > bDeviceClass = 0x0000 > bDeviceSubClass = 0x0000 > bDeviceProtocol = 0x0000 > bMaxPacketSize0 = 0x0040 > idVendor = 0x8564 > idProduct = 0x1000 > bcdDevice = 0x1100 > iManufacturer = 0x0001<JetFlash> > iProduct = 0x0002<Mass Storage Device> > iSerialNumber = 0x0003<83CA7S8M3LD8UGSF> > bNumConfigurations = 0x0001 > > -- dmesg without any quirks -- > ugen0.3:<JetFlash> at usbus0 > umass0:<JetFlash Mass Storage Device, class 0/0, rev 2.00/11.00, addr 3> on usbus0 > da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus11 target 0 lun 0 > da0:<JetFlash Transcend 16GB 1100> Removable Direct Access SCSI-4 device > da0: 40.000MB/s transfers > da0: 17454747090944MB (71776119061217281 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 0C) > > hexdump -Cv RC16.result > 00000000 00 ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 |................| > 00000010 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| > 00000020 > > `hexdump -Cv INQ.res` > 00000000 00 80 04 02 1f 73 6d 69 4a 65 74 46 6c 61 73 68 |.....smiJetFlash| > 00000010 54 72 61 6e 73 63 65 6e 64 20 31 36 47 42 20 20 |Transcend 16GB | > 00000020 31 31 30 30 00 80 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |1100............| > 00000030 00 00 00 00 00 00 28 00 03 01 82 06 00 3f 00 00 |......(......?..| > 00000040 00 00 28 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 50 50 00 00 00 |..(2.......PP...| > 00000050 30 50 50 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 21 84 84 21 1e |0PP........!..!.| > 00000060 00 03 48 00 00 c0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |..H.._at_..........| > 00000070 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 24 15 01 09 00 00 00 00 |........$.......| > 00000080 > > -- dmesg with UQ_MSC_NO_INQUIRY -- > ugen0.3:<JetFlash> at usbus0 > umass0:<JetFlash Mass Storage Device, class 0/0, rev 2.00/11.00, addr 3> on usbus0 > da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus11 target 0 lun 0 > da0:< > Removable Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da0: 40.000MB/s transfers > da0: 15477MB (31696896 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1973C) > > > Hmm, "READ CAPACITY(16)" can be used and device is alive. > With UQ_MSC_NO_INQUIRY, after run camcontrol, dd can read normally. > Without UQ_MSC_NO_INQUIRY, camcontrol can return something, > but dd can not be usable. Thank you. I see number of inconsistencies there. Device reports support for SPC-2 spec, but has PROTECT bit set in INQUIRY data, which is defined only since SPC-3 and reserved in SPC-2. Protection information, same as READ CAPACITY(16) command, defined only from SPC-3. SPC-2 devices should not know about it, returning error, but this device doesn't return error, instead returning something strange (correct sector size, but wrong number of sectors). I see the only clean solution in following specs more closely and not checking PROTECT bit for pre-SPC-3 devices. I don't know why Linux does for all SCSI-3/SPC devices, but for this device result is fatal. Please try the following patch. It should disable use of READ CAPACITY(16) in your case. --- scsi_da.c (revision 233697) +++ scsi_da.c (working copy) _at__at_ -1631,9 +1631,7 _at__at_ softc->minimum_cmd_size = 16; /* Predict whether device may support READ CAPACITY(16). */ - if (SID_ANSI_REV(&cgd->inq_data) >= SCSI_REV_SPC3 || - (SID_ANSI_REV(&cgd->inq_data) >= SCSI_REV_SPC && - (cgd->inq_data.spc3_flags & SPC3_SID_PROTECT))) { + if (SID_ANSI_REV(&cgd->inq_data) >= SCSI_REV_SPC3) { softc->flags |= DA_FLAG_CAN_RC16; softc->state = DA_STATE_PROBE2; } -- Alexander MotinReceived on Sat Mar 31 2012 - 08:16:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:25 UTC