On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:10:25AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 07/05/2012 12:35 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > >>> Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official compiler, because > >>> 4.2.1 is just too old for libreoffice, and I never managed to make it built > >>> (the 3.5) with gcc from ports. > >> > >> What problem are you running into? > >> I am able to build the latest libreoffice with gcc46. > > > > Really with no modification on the ports? > > Yes. (OK, I lied, see below) > > > Are you sure you are not building it with clang which is forced by default? > > Yes. I set WITH_GCC in make.conf. > > Some notes: > - I have boost 1.48 via the patches from the boost port maintainer (long overdue > to be committed) > - on one system I build (almost) all ports with gcc46 (base system is built in a > standard fashion) > - on another system I build (almost) all ports with base gcc (except, obviously, > those ports that have USE_GCC=4.6[+]) > > And, oh, almost forgot, I had to manually apply the attached patch in cppunit/ > subdirectory on FreeBSD 10. It seems that the source code in question is > extracted during build, so it is not possible to apply the patch during normal > patch target. The patch is for the well-known FreeBSD1 vs FreeBSD10 confusion > in autotools. Yes but only with gcc46 because cppunit needs the same libstdc++ as libreoffice so with gcc 4.6 is needs to be built with bundled, while it is unbundled with clang. regards, Bapt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:26 UTC