Re: [CFT] SMP/i386 suspend/resume

From: Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki_at_jp.FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 22:59:17 +0900 (JST)
Hi, Thanks for you report.

From: David Wolfskill <dhw_at_FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: [CFT] SMP/i386 suspend/resume
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:22:57 +0000
Message-ID: <20120511132257.GA96585_at_freefall.freebsd.org>

> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:10:19AM +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > I've been working on suspend/resume for SMP/i386 for a week
> > and created patches against CURRENT, RELENG_9 and RELENG_8
> > available at:
> > 
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/i386-SMP-suspend-CURRENT-20120511.diff
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/i386-SMP-suspend-RELENG_9-20120511.diff
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/i386-SMP-suspend-RELENG_8-20120511.diff
> > ...
> 
> I'm sorry to report that while head & stable/9 did work for me (see
> previous notes in this thread), stable/8 did not.  Well, suspend
> seemed to, but on resume, the screen stayed dark and the machine
> was (as far as I could tell without trying to ping it from another
> machine) unresponsive.

OK, we need some more investigation on RELENG_8 SMP.
I think Core 2 Duo can run amd64, would like to confirm
this problem can be reproduced only on i386 or not.
Could you try same thing on amd64?

Thanks

> 
> This was on the same Dell Precision M4400 as before (Core(TM)2 Duo CPU
> T9600), running:
> 
> FreeBSD localhost 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #382 235262M: Fri May 11 04:45:52 EDT 2012     root_at_localhost:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY  i386
> 
> Peace,
> david
> -- 
> David H. Wolfskill				dhw_at_freebsd.org
> There is a use for spam:  it helps identify spammers.
> I have no use for spammers.
> 
Received on Sun May 13 2012 - 11:59:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:26 UTC