Hi, Thanks for you report. From: David Wolfskill <dhw_at_FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] SMP/i386 suspend/resume Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:22:57 +0000 Message-ID: <20120511132257.GA96585_at_freefall.freebsd.org> > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:10:19AM +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: > > Hi > > > > I've been working on suspend/resume for SMP/i386 for a week > > and created patches against CURRENT, RELENG_9 and RELENG_8 > > available at: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/i386-SMP-suspend-CURRENT-20120511.diff > > http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/i386-SMP-suspend-RELENG_9-20120511.diff > > http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/i386-SMP-suspend-RELENG_8-20120511.diff > > ... > > I'm sorry to report that while head & stable/9 did work for me (see > previous notes in this thread), stable/8 did not. Well, suspend > seemed to, but on resume, the screen stayed dark and the machine > was (as far as I could tell without trying to ping it from another > machine) unresponsive. OK, we need some more investigation on RELENG_8 SMP. I think Core 2 Duo can run amd64, would like to confirm this problem can be reproduced only on i386 or not. Could you try same thing on amd64? Thanks > > This was on the same Dell Precision M4400 as before (Core(TM)2 Duo CPU > T9600), running: > > FreeBSD localhost 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #382 235262M: Fri May 11 04:45:52 EDT 2012 root_at_localhost:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY i386 > > Peace, > david > -- > David H. Wolfskill dhw_at_freebsd.org > There is a use for spam: it helps identify spammers. > I have no use for spammers. >Received on Sun May 13 2012 - 11:59:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:26 UTC