On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 16:35:59 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > When you proposed these changes not only did I not see a consensus for > you to move forward, I saw a non-zero number of people push back. > > Why did you proceed? - I had a non-zero number of people tell me that it looked good. - Peter doesn't seem to mind the clarification. - No objections were raised after I send out the changed patch which basically keeps things the way they were originally intended. Did you actually read what has been committed? Uli - amazed that a change to a document that apparently no one is reading can cause such a fuss.Received on Mon May 14 2012 - 05:02:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:26 UTC