* Peter Jeremy (peter_at_rulingia.com) wrote: > >> >2) Is this ok to backport the list from current to stable branches? Pro > >> >- it's really simple, con - it will contain files never installed with > >> >this (old) branch. > >> > >> Another con: "make delete-old" on -current takes about 2 orders of > >> magnitude longer to run than on 8.x. I would prefer to see some > >> effort put into speeding it up before it was backported. > > > >Is that really a reason while it is still under 4 seconds and is not > >usually run more often than updates (which take minutes if not hours)? > > My experience is that it now takes about 2½ minutes on 10.x with warm > caches, compared to less than 1 second on 8.x. Now = after applying my patch or after changing system? Which knobs were enabled? OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc is 3x larger after the patch - it's expected for things to become 3x slower, but definitely not 250x. > For most of that time, there's no output and there's no warning > of the increased time. I actually wrote about the poor performance > here a couple of weeks ago. Then you should try to profile it - my script basically runs delete-old delete-old-libs for every knob (131 of them), and it hadn't taken more than 4 seconds even once. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3_at_amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3_at_jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ruReceived on Mon May 28 2012 - 20:18:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:27 UTC