Am 11/03/12 16:01, schrieb Alfred Perlstein: > On 11/3/12 6:18 AM, Alie Tan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> No offence, just curious about scheduler and its functionality. >> >> What is the different between this two that makes FreeBSD performance far >> behind DragonFly BSD? http://www.dragonflybsd.org/release32/ > > Looks like a few specific benchmarks that DragonFly aimed to do well at > that we were unawares of. What is "specific" supposed to mean? It doesn't seem to be very "specific". This benchmark reflects a general tendency which can also be observed by the vast of benchmarks "Phoronix" performed. I guess FreeBSD has been benchmarked with ULE. ULE does have issues and it's obvious, that ULE performs in specific situations better than the legacy and old (but after so many years still competetive) BSD scheduler.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:31 UTC