Quick glance to nanobsd give me impression that: 1) nanobsd is MBR based, so : 2) nanobsd is disk-name-change sensitive. GPT way is better - I'm using r${REV} as label, and root can be mounted no matter how many other "firmware's" present, or how disks are ordered. BTW, due to bug 173309 I had to rebuild and update my server, which took only few minutes for reboot. Well, nanobsd is great thing, I'll look into it a bit more, but it's goal to have minified FreeBSD, while I need read-only one. -- Regards, Alexander YerenkowReceived on Sat Nov 03 2012 - 21:12:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:31 UTC