> Hello, > > avg_at_ suggested to include compiler version in the kernel so that it's > present in uname (and one can easly tell what was used to compile it). > > Here is my attempt: > http://people.freebsd.org/~mjg/patches/newvers-compiler.diff > > Basically adds compiler name and version/revision after revision of > system sources. > > Sample output from dirty git sources: > gcc: > FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #7 r242962=264d569-dirty(gcc-4.2.1-20070831): Wed > Nov 14 00:11:51 CET 2012 > > clang: > FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #8 r242962=264d569-dirty(clang-r162107): Wed Nov 14 > 00:12:26 CET 2012 > > Sample output from svn with gcc: > FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1 r243006:243007M(gcc-4.2.1-20070831): Wed Nov 14 > 00:41:23 CET 2012 > > I have no strong opinions on format, I just want this information easly > accessible. > > Comments? in the old days (I'm talking before C :-) I remmeber one compiler putting such info in the code it produced, I wonder if that's the case with gcc/clang, and if so it would be nice if file(1) could show it. my 3c, dannyReceived on Wed Nov 14 2012 - 06:02:04 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:32 UTC