To people knowing the code, do the following documentation changes look correct? --- a/share/man/man9/lock.9 +++ b/share/man/man9/lock.9 _at__at_ -148,7 +148,9 _at__at_ Flags indicating what action is to be taken. .Bl -tag -width ".Dv LK_CANRECURSE" .It Dv LK_SHARED Acquire a shared lock. -If an exclusive lock is currently held, it will be downgraded. +If an exclusive lock is currently held, +.Dv EDEADLK +will be returned. .It Dv LK_EXCLUSIVE Acquire an exclusive lock. If an exclusive lock is already held, and _at__at_ -158,7 +160,8 _at__at_ is not set, the system will .It Dv LK_DOWNGRADE Downgrade exclusive lock to a shared lock. Downgrading a shared lock is not permitted. -If an exclusive lock has been recursed, all references will be downgraded. +If an exclusive lock has been recursed, the system will +.Xr panic 9 . .It Dv LK_UPGRADE Upgrade a shared lock to an exclusive lock. If this call fails, the shared lock is lost. -- Andriy GaponReceived on Thu Nov 15 2012 - 12:06:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:32 UTC