On Nov 20, 2012 9:44 AM, "Mark Martinec" <Mark.Martinec+freebsd_at_ijs.si> wrote: > > Paul Webster wrote: > > I am aware this is a much discussed subject since the upgrade of PF, > > I believe the final decision was that too many users are used to the old > > style pf and an upgrade to the new syntax would cause too much confusion. > > I don't buy that. Think of a confusion in a year of two when > OpenBSD PF rules and the PF documentation won't match the > legacy syntax in FreeBSD's PF. Their documentation already doesn't match the legacy syntax, you have to look for older pf documentation to match that in use by FreeBSD. This has been the case since at least OpenBSD 4.7: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade47.html To get documentation for FreeBSD pf, you generally need to look for OpenBSD documentation for 4.2 or 4.3 as there were minute changes in the mid-4.x range. kmwReceived on Wed Nov 21 2012 - 00:57:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:32 UTC