On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 09:54:14AM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote: > Hi, > > Would someone check the following code? > > If the hardware do not process an 802.1Q tag, the kernel repacks mbuf > in line 578-580. But, `struct ether_header *eh' was assigned at line 484. > > And, in line 611-637, because of the kernel refers old eh pointer, the > kernel will misjudges its ether packet. > > I think that `eh = mtod(m, struct ether_header *);' is needed after > line 580. Yes, your analysis looks correct. > > Thanks, > Kohji Okuno > > sys/net/if_ethersubr.c: > 448 static void > 449 ether_input_internal(struct ifnet *ifp, struct mbuf *m) > 450 { > 451 struct ether_header *eh; > > 484 eh = mtod(m, struct ether_header *); > > 554 /* > 555 * If the hardware did not process an 802.1Q tag, do this now, > 556 * to allow 802.1P priority frames to be passed to the main input > 557 * path correctly. > 558 * TODO: Deal with Q-in-Q frames, but not arbitrary nesting levels. > 559 */ > 560 if ((m->m_flags & M_VLANTAG) == 0 && etype == ETHERTYPE_VLAN) { > > 578 bcopy((char *)evl, (char *)evl + ETHER_VLAN_ENCAP_LEN, > 579 ETHER_HDR_LEN - ETHER_TYPE_LEN); > 580 m_adj(m, ETHER_VLAN_ENCAP_LEN); > 581 } > > 610 > 611 #if defined(INET) || defined(INET6) > 612 /* > 613 * Clear M_PROMISC on frame so that carp(4) will see it when the > 614 * mbuf flows up to Layer 3. > 615 * FreeBSD's implementation of carp(4) uses the inprotosw > 616 * to dispatch IPPROTO_CARP. carp(4) also allocates its own > 617 * Ethernet addresses of the form 00:00:5e:00:01:xx, which > 618 * is outside the scope of the M_PROMISC test below. > 619 * TODO: Maintain a hash table of ethernet addresses other than > 620 * ether_dhost which may be active on this ifp. > 621 */ > 622 if (ifp->if_carp && (*carp_forus_p)(ifp, eh->ether_dhost)) { > 623 m->m_flags &= ~M_PROMISC; > 624 } else > 625 #endif > 626 { > 627 /* > 628 * If the frame received was not for our MAC address, set the > 629 * M_PROMISC flag on the mbuf chain. The frame may need to > 630 * be seen by the rest of the Ethernet input path in case of > 631 * re-entry (e.g. bridge, vlan, netgraph) but should not be > 632 * seen by upper protocol layers. > 633 */ > 634 if (!ETHER_IS_MULTICAST(eh->ether_dhost) && > 635 bcmp(IF_LLADDR(ifp), eh->ether_dhost, ETHER_ADDR_LEN) != 0) > 636 m->m_flags |= M_PROMISC; > 637 }Received on Mon Nov 26 2012 - 07:10:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:32 UTC