On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 18:16 +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > Em 04-10-2012 16:50, Dennis Glatting escreveu: > > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 12:53 +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > it has been more than 3 months ago that BSD sort became default in HEAD > >> > and no serious complaints have been raised against it since then so I > >> > plan to permanently remove GNU sort from head in the next days. If you > >> > have any objection, please raise it now. > >> > > > Initially I had problems with multi TB files (--unique, five to ten > > files) but I haven't had to do that in two(?) months. I will be getting > > back to that project in a month or so. > > > > It challanges a system's resources. :) > > And did it go much better with base GNU sort? It's quite an extreme > case... :) Multi GB is also rare not speaking about multi TB... > Yes. However my problem now is ZFS stability -- typically locking up, case example today: last pid: 67998; load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 up 1+19:50:51 19:02:10 80 processes: 1 running, 79 sleeping CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle Mem: 146M Active, 2765M Inact, 35G Wired, 371M Buf, 86G Free ARC: 32G Total, 4141M MRU, 27G MFU, 55M Anon, 485M Header, 614M Other Swap: 233G Total, 233G Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 17517 root 17 42 4 217M 128M tx->tx 21 25.3H 0.00% pbzip2 17568 root 17 52 4 201M 116M tx->tx 24 25.2H 0.00% pbzip2 17508 root 17 46 4 201M 116M tx->tx 33 24.6H 0.00% pbzip2 17544 root 17 52 4 205M 120M tx->tx 37 24.6H 0.00% pbzip2 17532 root 17 52 4 209M 123M tx->tx 35 24.5H 0.00% pbzip2 etc.Received on Fri Oct 05 2012 - 01:09:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:31 UTC