Am 11.10.2012 08:02, schrieb Matthew Seaman: > On 10/10/2012 23:20, Vincent Hoffman wrote: >>> That's if you were to patch an already installed copy of >>> portmaster. >>>> The patch is designed to be placed in >>>> >>>> ${PORTSDIR}/ports-mgmt/portmaster/files/ >>>> >>>> so it would be applied as part of the normal process of >>>> building the portmaster port. In which case portmaster.sh.in >>>> is definitely the correct target. > >> Actually not so, maybe something has changed recently? Definitely ;-) > I stand corrected. Looks like Bryan switched things around a bit > when he imported everything to GitHub. > > I'll fix the patch pro-tem although it should become redundant Real > Soon Now. My first assumption was, that the patch had already been integrated into portmaster, when it failed to apply to the updated port. But the resulting portmaster script did not support PKGNG, which made me look for an updated patch and finally try to apply the previous patch to the renamed file fetched by the port. I just wanted to point out, that while the patch from October 2nd does no longer find the file to patch (since it has been renamed), that it still is required (with the changed filename). It took me some time to resolve this issue and I just wanted to spare others from wasting their time ... Regards, STefanReceived on Thu Oct 11 2012 - 07:42:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:31 UTC