On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Monthadar Al Jaberi <monthadar_at_gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Kim Culhan <w8hdkim_at_gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Monthadar Al Jaberi >> <monthadar_at_gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Kim Culhan <w8hdkim_at_gmail.com> wrote: >>>> With 2 interfaces present on a bridge0, an arp request is send from >>>> msk0 and is received >>>> by a machine on em0. >>>> >>>> When a reply to that arp request is sent by a machine on em0 it is not >>>> visible on the >>>> bridge0 nor on msk0 as indicated by tcpdump. >>>> >>>> The arp reply is visible while watching em0 with tcpdump. >>> >>> Is em0 set in promisc mode? >>> >>>> >>>> This behaviour is also true when arp requests are sent from a wlan >>>> interface ath0 >>>> and received on a wired interface, the arp reply is visible on the >>>> wired interface but not >>>> visible monitoring with 'tcpdump -i bridge0 arp'. >>> >>> Hmm, I am briding between ath0 and wired (arge0). >>> >>> Can you provide more info? what is your rc.conf? How does it set the interfaces? >>> Can you give ifconfig output? >>> The are reply that you dont see on bridge0 can you dump it from wired >>> interface? >> >> What svn revision of FreeBSD -current are you running? > > FreeBSD head r238604. I should have mentioned earlier this is with r242126, there have been some changes to the network code since 238604, maybe that is why you don't have this problem. -kimReceived on Mon Oct 29 2012 - 20:59:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:31 UTC