On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:10:24 -0500, Michael Butler <imb_at_protected-networks.net> wrote: > - From the link (http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/errata.html#WhatComp) > that Steve Kargl referenced (dated July 2012). I don't know where this guy is getting his info, but CLANG is /more/ standards compliant and doesn't have an issue producing "correct" code. Though it might not be the fastest (yet). And if Apple (probably one of the largest commercial CLANG users) doesn't have an issue with it producing "incorrect" code why should we believe this guy?Received on Tue Sep 11 2012 - 14:43:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:30 UTC