Hi, Here is the output. the machine is HP Microserver N36L. onboard lan. bge0_at_pci0:4:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x705d103c chip=0x165b14e4 rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' device = 'NetXtreme BCM5723 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe' class = network subclass = ethernet bar [10] = type Memory, range 64, base 0xfe9f0000, size 65536, enabled cap 01[48] = powerspec 3 supports D0 D3 current D0 cap 03[40] = VPD cap 09[60] = vendor (length 108) cap 05[50] = MSI supports 1 message, 64 bit enabled with 1 message cap 10[cc] = PCI-Express 2 endpoint max data 128(256) link x1(x1) ecap 0001[100] = AER 1 0 fatal 0 non-fatal 1 corrected ecap 0002[13c] = VC 1 max VC0 ecap 0003[160] = Serial 1 d8d385fffeaf9f38 ecap 0004[16c] = unknown 1 Regards. Qian >On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 03:19:52PM +0900, Wanpeng Qian wrote: >> Hi, I encounter a watchdog timeout issue on NetXtreme BCM5723 Gigabit >> Ethernet PCIe, dose this patch solve this issue? > >I'm not aware of BCM5723. Could you show me the output of "pciconf -lcbv"? > >> >> If so, I can test it. >> >> Regards. >> >> Qian >> >> >All, >> > >> >There were lots of reports that stock bge(4) does not work on Dell >> >Rx20/HP DL 360 G8. With the help of Broadcom and BCM5719/BCM5720 >> >users I managed to address the issue but I had to touch very >> >sensitive part of driver. Before committing the change to tree I'd >> >like to know whether this change introduces regressions on old >> >bge(4) controllers. If you're bge(4) user, please try latest WIP >> >version at the following URL and let me know how it goes on your >> >box. I'm especially interested in whether there is any ASF/IPMI >> >regression on BCM570x/571x. >> > >> >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/bge/if_bge.c >> >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/bge/if_bgereg.h >> >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/bge/brgphy.c >> > >> ><Build instructions> >> >1. Copy both if_bge.c/if_bgereg.h to /usr/src/sys/dev/bge directory >> >2. Copy brgphy.c /usr/src/sys/dev/mii >> >3. Rebuild kernel and reboot to take the change effect. >> > >> >You can also use the files above for for 9.1/stable/9. For stable/8 >> >it needs slight modification and I couldn't find time to regenerate >> >the patch. >> > >> >Thanks.Received on Fri Sep 14 2012 - 06:38:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:30 UTC