Re: underexposed snapshots

> As I said, this is the latest snapshot. Long story short is that the
> old process was changed before 9.0 and releng hasn't caught up with
> the new process yet in a sustainable manner (at least, not executing
> it on a regular basis). If you have interest in making sure regular
> (monthly) releases are revived, I'm sure that re_at_ would be more than
> receptive (they're good to have, but I tried to use the new process
> and quite frankly don't have the spare cycles to complete the needed
> work to make things function post-9.x).

if folk such as i hit barriers to testing, this does not bode well for
the quality of 10.x in the long run.

what is the new process?  i could not find in handbook.

randy