El día Monday, April 01, 2013 a las 08:54:59PM -0700, Kevin Oberman escribió: > > Is there something in the base system of r235646 which would not allow > > to do so, i.e. which is to old for HEAD of ports? > > > > I'm not quite sure what you mean by "update /usr/ports with SVN to HEAD", > since ports does not branch, so any time you "svn up /usr/potrts", it is > updated to head. I used the term 'HEAD' because the SVN command I have used was: # svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/ports/head /usr/ports > Any version of FreeBSD 8 or newer should work fine with > ports/head. Note that some ports will need to be compiled with gcc as not > all will work with clang. thanks; > > Are you having a problem updating (or checking out) head or with some of > the ports after the update? the system in question hast around 1200 ports compiled based on the CVS checkout of ports on May 19 last year; I want to check if I could compile Ekiga out of its GIT, wich needs gtk+3.4.x and other recent stuff; I will just for a test rename /usr/local and /var/db/pkg, update the ports to 'HEAD' and compile them again to see if this would solve the problem and make Ekiga happy. Thanks for your feedback matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org E-mail: guru_at_unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standardsReceived on Tue Apr 02 2013 - 03:03:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:36 UTC