On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 3:04:15 am Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <1424327083.20130410103010_at_serebryakov.spb.ru>, Lev Serebryakov writ > es: > >Hello, Poul-Henning. > >You wrote 10 =E0=EF=F0=E5=EB=FF 2013 =E3., 0:52:04: > > > >>> Problem is, that every uart device now is independent from each > >>> other in good "OOP" style, and it looks like interrupt sharing we > >>> need one interrupt handler per irq (not per device), which will now > >>> about several UARTs. Something like "multiport" device, bot not > >>> exactly. > >PHK> That is what the puc(4) driver does... > > Yes, for PCI devices only :( > > Yes, it needs to learn to do it from hints for ISA. No, that is that not the right hammer for this. This isn't a single ISA device with two ports (which is what puc(4) is aimed at). -- John BaldwinReceived on Wed Apr 10 2013 - 12:43:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:36 UTC