Hello, Mark. You wrote 15 апреля 2013 г., 2:25:07: >> Yes! This is the most clever thought in this thread. Why we need 3 >> firewalls? Two packet filters it's excess too. We have two packet filters: >> one with excellent syntax and functionality but with outdated bandwidth >> control mechanism (aka ALTQ); another - with nice traffic >> shaper/prioritization (dummynet)/classification (diffused) but with >> complicated implementation in not trivial tasks. May be the next step >> will be discussion about one packet filter in the system?.. MM> ... and as far as I can tell none of them is currently usable MM> on an IPv6-only FreeBSD (like protecting a host with sshguard), MM> none of them supports stateful NAT64, nor IPv6 prefix translation :( IPv6 prefix translation?! AGAIN!? FML. I've thought, that IPv6 will render all that NAT nightmare to void. I hope, IPv6 prefix translation will not be possible never ever! -- // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev_at_FreeBSD.org>Received on Mon Apr 15 2013 - 08:15:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:36 UTC