On 14.04.13 21:55, Joe Holden wrote: > For non-nat ipfw is still superior in every way, numbered rules > (think: scripts), dummynet, much faster than pf, syntax is a lot nicer > and predictable... And, best of all, it still is buggy. At lest, it's tables handling is unusable. I have been very stubborn IPFW user for very long time, but finally gave up in favor of PF. Nothing like that ever since. I am also not convinced IPFW is any faster than PF. DanielReceived on Mon Apr 15 2013 - 09:00:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:36 UTC