Re: Light humour

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 09:07:15PM +0300, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
> Not criticizing, just commenting.
> I heard such utter nonsense sometimes, in which people do believe despite
> all common sense, that I'm not amused, but scared :)

Well - I don't see a problem with this.
The people who don't understand enough to believe this crap won't use any
BSD and go to Linux instead.
It all contribute to the same quality as Linux already is.
Type "netstat -nr" and you don't get IPv6 routing table - even windows agrees
to traditional netstat -nr behavour...
Interface isolation for ARP requests - what's that?
Want to know link states use some strange tools.
We all can extend this list forever.
You just need to look at bootmessages to know how inconsistent Linux is.
I didn't read all of the text, but the tiny bit is already failing logic in
itself, which is the main reason why it is funny after all.
I don't want any of those persons who believe this text anywhere else than
on the other side.

> This blog is humor to very small, limited group of people, and at same time
> it's anti-bsd blog to bigger audience, who will not bother read some lines,
> instead peek in title, get few words here, few there, and close it. In they
> memory will be essence - that *BSD is suck, probably not allover, but they
> will remember that there are exist areas in which BSD have big problems.
> Mix this with lacking `nextgen techs` like KMS, decent virtualization
> level, no utf-8 in console and other myths, partial myths, or obsolete
> problems of old releases, and you'll receive bad opinion on BSD.
> But, there's not much to be done actually :)

-- 
B.Walter <bernd_at_bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de
Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.