On Friday, August 09, 2013 4:03:33 pm John Baldwin wrote: > I'm in the process of reverting 254150 and 254141. I think the changes in > 254141 were from an old tree that wasn't updated for the changes in 254138 and > I don't seen an obvious way to fix 254141, so until Attilio can redo 254141 > I'm going to revert these. Alan submitted a fix for the 254141 and I've booted it successfully so I've commited that. However, please be sure to update to at least 254163. -- John BaldwinReceived on Fri Aug 09 2013 - 19:32:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:40 UTC