Re: CURRENT crashes with nvidia GPU BLOB : vm_radix_insert: key 23c078 is already present

From: Gary Jennejohn <gljennjohn_at_googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 15:39:48 +0200
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 14:59:22 +0200
"O. Hartmann" <ohartman_at_zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:

> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 11:31:19 +0200
> Gary Jennejohn <gljennjohn_at_googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 11:10:40 +0200
> > Rainer Hurling <rhurlin_at_gwdg.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > Yes, I can confirm, that it builds, installs and runs fine for me.
> > > 
> > > The patch should be placed as
> > > x11/nvidia-driver/files/patch-src__nvidia_subr.c, shoudn't it?
> > > 
> > > Many thanks for this work.
> > > 
> > 
> > Thanks for testing.
> > 
> > Yes, putting the patch into files/ with that name works also and
> > is much simpler than the steps I outlined.
> > 
> 
> 
> Placing the patch in files as recommended here doesn't play well with
> the obvious intention of the REINPLACE command:
> 
> the patch only applies to 319.25.
> 
> I use the cutting edge 325.15. The patch doesn't apply since some lines
> shifted - here comes the tricky REINPLACE part of the Makefile in place.
> 
> I simply adapted your patches discussed and introduced here and
> "adapted" the REINPLACE statements/pattern around line 160 in the
> toplevel Makefile of port x11/nvidia-driver.
> 
> Find the patch attached - I forgot to raise PORTREVISION=1.
> 
> I'm now sending this email from the prior crashing box with the patch
> discussed applied via the Makefile to 325.15.
> 
> Thanks a lot for the fast help.
> 

Yes, this is a better approach.  I made my patch before realizing
that the REINPLACE_CMD was the source of the errors.

Any real advantage to using 325.15?

You should submit a PR with this patch.

-- 
Gary Jennejohn
Received on Sat Aug 10 2013 - 11:39:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:40 UTC