On 8/23/13 8:26 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 23/08/2013 14:06 David Chisnall said the following: >> Our gcc is from 2007. It has no C11, no C++11 support. It has bugs in its >> atomic generation so you can't use it sensibly without lots of inline >> assembly (which it doesn't support for newer architectures) for >> multithreaded things. >> >> Our libstdc++ is ancient and doesn't work with modern C++ codebases. > On the other hand these tools are perfect for building FreeBSD kernel and base. > Extrapolating my experience with base GCC I am very confident in it as a > FreeBSD development tool. > Extrapolating my experience with Clang I am not yet confident in it as a > FreeBSD development tool. > > I do not care about C11, C++11 and modern C++ codebases. I care about what's > in /usr/src and what gets compiled by buildkernel/buildworld. That's just me, > of course. But, OTOH, those who care modern C++ codebases should be perfectly > capable to install a compiler from ports or switch to clang as their default > compiler. > +1 I'd like to see it still be "there if you need it" in 10 in 11 it's in portsReceived on Fri Aug 23 2013 - 16:17:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:40 UTC