On 24 Aug 2013, at 11:30, "Sam Fourman Jr." <sfourman_at_gmail.com> wrote: > So I vote, let's not give ourselves the burden of "lugging" dead weight in > base > for another 5 years. (in 2017 do we still want to be worrying about gcc in > base?) Perhaps more to the point, in 2017 do we want to be responsible for maintaining a fork of a 2007 release of gcc and libstdc++? DavidReceived on Sat Aug 24 2013 - 09:19:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:40 UTC