On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 06:30:24AM -0400, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > > If the 150 ports that only work with gcc, all work with a ports > > > > gcc and do not need the gcc from base, would the following be OK ? > > > > > > - 9.x gcc default and clang in base; > > > - 10.x clang default and gcc in ports; > > > > Well, we write rules and we brake them. ;-) > > > > Just say that we know we brake them but it's inevitable because... > > And go futher. > > > > I am not a developer, just a user, so I am not versed in all of the > issues but I > would REALLY like to see gcc moved to ports for 10.x > > In my opinion this just needs to happen, if ports break, we deal with that > on a case by case basis. Oh, I remember. mplayer on i386 can't be builded witch clang -- clang don't understand inlined asm.Received on Sat Aug 24 2013 - 09:49:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:40 UTC