----- Original Message ----- > Bezüglich Bryan Venteicher's Nachricht vom 27.08.2013 06:18 (localtime): > > ... > > >> It seems if_vmx doesn't support jumbo frames. If I set mtu 9000, I get > >> »vmx0: cannot populate Rx queue 0«, I have no problems using jumbo > >> frames with vmxnet3. > >> > > This could fail for two reasons - could not allocate an mbuf cluster, > > or the call to bus_dmamap_load_mbuf_sg() failed. For the former, you > > should check vmstat -z. For the later, the behavior of > > bus_dmamap_load_mbuf_sg() > > changed between 9.1 and 9.2, and I know it was broken for awhile. I don't > > recall exactly when I fixed it (I think shortly after I made the original > > announcement). Could you retry with the files from HEAD _at_ [1]? Also, there > > are new sysctl oids (dev.vmx.X.mbuf_load_failed & dev.vmx.X.mgetcl_failed) > > for these errors. > > > > I just compiled the driver on 9.2-RC2 with the sources from HEAD and was > > able to change the MTU to 9000. > > > > [1]- http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/dev/vmware/vmxnet3/ > > Thanks a lot for your ongoing work! > I can confirm that with recent if_vmx.c from head and compiled for > 9.2-RC3, setting mtu to 9000 works as expected :-) > > > >> I took a oldish host (4x2,8GHz Core2[LGA775]) with recent software: ESXi > >> 5.1U1 and FreeBSD-9.2-RC2 > >> Two guests are connected to one MTU9000 "VMware Software Switch". > >> > > I've got a few performance things to still look at. What's the sysctl > > dev.vmx.X output for the if_vmx<->if_vmx tests? > > Just repeated if_vmx simple iperf bench, results vary slightly from > standard 10sec run to run, but still noticable high Intr usage: > The intr usage is higher than the other drivers you compared against because if_vmx does the off-level processing in ithreads where as the others do it in a taskqueue. BTW: if_vmx can to LRO as well. I don't think the emulated e1000 can, but I bet the e1000e does. > if_vmx <-> if_vmx > 1.32 GBits/sec, load: 10-45%Sys 40-48%Intr > > if_vmxJumbo <-> if_vmxJumbo > 5.01 GBits/sec, load: 10-45%Sys 40-48%Intr > > Please find attached the different outputs of dev.vmx.X (the mtu9000 run was > only 3.47GBits/sec in that case, took the numbers anyway) > > wbr, > > -Harry > >Received on Tue Aug 27 2013 - 12:53:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:40 UTC