Outback Dingo wrote this message on Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 19:01 -0400: > On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Ollivier Robert <roberto_at_keltia.freenix.fr > > wrote: > > > According to Ollivier Robert: > > > You are right, I wanted to say r226837 which is the "code" one. > > > > FYI I've finally merged r226837,r226839 as r254856 in stable/9 as it is a > > prerequesite to apply jmg's patch. I've asked re_at_ whether they would > > consider this for 9.2. It is very late in the 9.2 release circle but that > > patch has been in 10 for more than a year now... > > > > > So this patch can now be applied to STABLE/9 for testing on a local system > since these 3 revisions are now in?? I've compile tested the patch, but not run tested it: https://people.freebsd.org/~jmg/aesni.9stable.patch Note that 9stable uses gcc by default and this patch required clang, so make sure you set WITH_CLANG=YES WITH_CLANG_IS_CC=YES, otherwise it won't compile... This patch only required minor changes from my original patch to apply.. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."Received on Tue Aug 27 2013 - 23:26:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:40 UTC