On 08/30/13 15:19, Lundberg, Johannes wrote: > Hi Hans > > I tried that too and no change... But, the variable overflow you > introduced, it is never increased, right? So, it will never become zero... > It will become zero when it wraps. Maybe 2**32 is too long. You could add a printf while it is running, and see if it goes == 1000000 for example. --HPS > Johannes Lundberg > BRILLIANTSERVICE CO., LTD. <http://www.brilliantservice.co.jp> > > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Hans Petter Selasky <hps_at_bitfrost.no>wrote: > >> On 08/30/13 13:54, Lundberg, Johannes wrote: >> >>> Still got the same behaviour after applying the patch... >>> >>> Johannes Lundberg >>> BRILLIANTSERVICE CO., LTD. <http://www.brilliantservice.**co.jp<http://www.brilliantservice.co.jp>Received on Fri Aug 30 2013 - 11:31:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:41 UTC