Re: GCC withdraw

From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw_at_zxy.spb.ru>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 23:22:06 +0400
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 04:11:08PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:

> Anyway, Ian has reminded me that I'm getting stuck in sidetracks, so here's an executive summary of what I'm ACTUALLY proposing:
> 
> - On platforms where clang is cc, don't build libstdc++, make libc++ the default.  Provide libstdc++ from base as a 9-compat package.
> 
> - On platforms where clang is cc, don't build gcc by default (I've already agreed not to commit this part, since it seems very controversial, although I'd like to better understand why it is so)

And remember about breaking firewire+clang
Received on Fri Aug 30 2013 - 17:20:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:41 UTC