Re: RFC: (Unconditionally) enable -fno-strict-overflow for kernel builds

From: <dt71_at_gmx.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 03:20:07 +0100

Adrian Chadd wrote, On 12/01/2013 01:33:
> Are you able to have clang/llvm/gcc tell us where/when code is relying
> on undefined behaviour? So we can, like, fix them?

Well, there's -ftrapv.

Received on Sun Dec 01 2013 - 01:20:47 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: dt71_at_gmx.com: "Re: [RFC] how to get the size of a malloc(9) block ?"
Previous message: John-Mark Gurney: "Re: [RFC] how to get the size of a malloc(9) block ?"
In reply to: Adrian Chadd: "Re: RFC: (Unconditionally) enable -fno-strict-overflow for kernel builds"
Next in thread: Peter Wemm: "Re: RFC: (Unconditionally) enable -fno-strict-overflow for kernel builds"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:44 UTC