On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: >> Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you found >> anything new? Having build the port and all dependencies with standard >> options, octave is segfaulting for me, too. Anyhow, I can run octave with: >> >> env LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libc++.so.1 octave >> >> Some very light testing indicates that it is working. Of course, this is >> not ideal. >> >> Maybe this gives a clue how to fix the octave port properly. > > I have a preliminary patch for math/octave that I wanted to test on > redports first, but it is down at the moment so here it is. The tests were successful: https://redports.org/buildarchive/20131201105316-94935/ (octave) https://redports.org/buildarchive/20131201115701-22333/ (octave-forge-base) The octave logs also contain the results of running the regression-test target. The output is the same on all FreeBSD versions. The problem is that USE_FORTRAN=yes implies USE_GCC=yes. This means the C++ code in math/octave is compiled with gcc46/libstdc++ which does not work if dependencies have been built with clang/libc++. The patch copies the USE_FORTRAN=yes logic from Mk/bsd.gcc.mk into a new file Mk/Uses/fortran.mk. It allows ports to use a Fortran compiler together with the base system C/C++ compiler.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:44 UTC