Re: pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)

From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 16:11:55 +0400

On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 02:09:14PM +0200, Vladimir Sharun wrote:
V> Dear Gleb, 
V> Is kernel rebuilding enuff ? 

Should be enough wrt pf(4), no API or ABI changes in it.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.

Received on Tue Dec 03 2013 - 11:11:58 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Glen Barber: "FreeBSD 10.0-BETA4 now available"
Previous message: Vladimir Sharun: "Re[2]: pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)"
In reply to: Vladimir Sharun: "Re[2]: pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)"
Next in thread: Vladimir Sharun: "Re[2]: pf reply-to malfunction after r258468 (seems r258479)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:45 UTC