On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 21:26:18 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > On 12/01/2013 15:06, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote: > >> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > >>> Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you found > >>> anything new? Having build the port and all dependencies with standard > >>> options, octave is segfaulting for me, too. Anyhow, I can run octave with: > >>> > >>> env LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libc++.so.1 octave > >>> > >>> Some very light testing indicates that it is working. Of course, this is > >>> not ideal. > >>> > >>> Maybe this gives a clue how to fix the octave port properly. > >> > >> I have a preliminary patch for math/octave that I wanted to test on > >> redports first, but it is down at the moment so here it is. > > > > The tests were successful: > > https://redports.org/buildarchive/20131201105316-94935/ (octave) > > https://redports.org/buildarchive/20131201115701-22333/ (octave-forge-base) > > The octave logs also contain the results of running the regression-test > > target. The output is the same on all FreeBSD versions. > > > > The problem is that USE_FORTRAN=yes implies USE_GCC=yes. This means > > the C++ code in math/octave is compiled with gcc46/libstdc++ which > > does not work if dependencies have been built with clang/libc++. > > > > The patch copies the USE_FORTRAN=yes logic from Mk/bsd.gcc.mk into a > > new file Mk/Uses/fortran.mk. It allows ports to use a Fortran compiler > > together with the base system C/C++ compiler. > > With the patch, math/octave fails for me on 9.2-RELEASE/amd64 and > 10.0-BETA4/amd64 with: > > checking for amd64-portbld-freebsd(9.2|10.0)-gfortran... f77 > checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran 77 compiler... no > checking whether f77 accepts -g... no > checking how to get verbose linking output from f77... configure: > WARNING: compilation failed > > checking for Fortran 77 libraries of f77... > checking for dummy main to link with Fortran 77 libraries... none > checking for Fortran 77 name-mangling scheme... configure: error: in > `/usr/ports/math/octave/work/octave-3.6.4': > configure: error: cannot compile a simple Fortran program > > Full logs attached (each with and without your patch). > > In both cases, it tries to use f77, while the original port uses gfortran46. > > Any idea what is wrong on my system? Do you define FC in make.conf maybe?Received on Tue Dec 03 2013 - 19:54:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:45 UTC