On 12/17/13 12:34, Allan Jude wrote: > On 2013-12-17 10:54, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The MAC of the lagg needs to be the same as the wireless interface. >> >> I'm going to just state right now that using lagg as the failover >> method for doing wireless/wired integration isn't supported by me. If >> someone wants to make it supported then they need to claim it. :) >> >> >> -a >> >> >> On 17 December 2013 05:06, dan_partelly <dan_partelly_at_rdsor.ro> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've set up wireless link aggregation on FreeBSD 10 RC1 and RC2 as >>> described in the FreeBSD handbook, on an oldish Compaq nc6320 laptop. >>> >>> What happens is: >>> >>> If I boot the system with the Ethernet cable attached, I correctly get >>> lagg0 active port on master- bg0- and the network is working correctly. >>> (I mainly test pinging my gateway). When I pull the cable out, lagg0 >>> device correctly switches to wlan0 as shown by ifconfig (wlan0 is created >>> from wpi0), but at the same time I get no more ping replies from my >>> gateway. I can leave the system in this state for several minutes as an >>> example >>> and no replies are coming through. A simple list of interfaces with >>> ifconfig with no parameters brigs the network back to life, and I start to >>> get back the due ping replyes, this time thrugh wireless link. >>> >>> >>> Please, if possible en-light me on tis problem. I sat at your disposition >>> with any info you may deem necessary to get this fixed (if it needs a fix). >>> >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > > If I am am understanding correctly, Dan and Nikolai say that just > running 'ifconfig' brings the lagg back to life. Why would that make a > difference at all? Running ifconfig with no parameters shouldn't be > changing anything. > I see the same lagg behavior change going from 9.2->10.0, but for me the test is slightly different. My wired and wireless networks use different IP address ranges, so I need to re-run dhclient on lagg0, but I can't get an address on it. In fact, dhclient doesn't work at all with a lagg interface when it is only backed by my wireless card. Without a lagg interface, I can get addresses on both wired and wireless cards individually and act dual-homed just fine. - Nikolai LifanovReceived on Tue Dec 17 2013 - 16:58:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:45 UTC