On 2013-12-17 16:28, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote: > On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:53:02 -0800 > Maksim Yevmenkin <maksim.yevmenkin_at_gmail.com> wrote: > >> hello, > Hi Maksim! > >> would anyone object to this patch? > It is good idea, but sometimes shutdown sequence longer than some H/W > watchdogs even support. > I have one board which can do only 20sec maximum time. > >> max >> >> Index: src/etc/rc.d/watchdogd >> =================================================================== >> --- src/etc/rc.d/watchdogd (revision 2999) >> +++ src/etc/rc.d/watchdogd (working copy) >> _at__at_ -39,4 +39,7 _at__at_ >> pidfile="/var/run/${name}.pid" >> >> load_rc_config $name >> + >> +sig_stop="${watchdogd_sig_stop:-TERM}" >> + >> run_rc_command "$1" >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" > I've been seeing an issue where sometimes my system seems to hang after the shutdown. where not stopping the watchdog might help. I wonder if it would be best to make some kind of rc.conf variable to allow the user to opt for one or the other, keeping the current behaviour for POLA. -- Allan Jude
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:45 UTC