Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Matthias Apitz <guru_at_unixarea.de> wrote:

> El día Wednesday, December 18, 2013 a las 12:59:16PM -0800, Freddie Cash
> escribió:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Apitz <guru_at_unixarea.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > > As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not
> > > CVS) and the svn client is only in the ports tree and not in the base
> > > system, how is this thought to work in a clean way, without dusting the
> > > system before with some binary packages, only based on base system and
> > > sources?
> > >
> > > svnlite is included in the base OS for 10.0.
> >
> > See https://wiki.freebsd.org/WhatsNew/FreeBSD10 for details.  And
> > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=251886 for the
> commit
> > message.
>
> Ok, thanks; but see this:
>
> $ uname -a
> FreeBSD tiny-r255948 10.0-ALPHA4 FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA4 #1: Fri Oct 18
> 12:10:57 CEST 2013 guru_at_aurora.Sisis.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC/i386
> $ svnlite
> Type 'svn help' for usage.
> $ svn help
> svn: not found
>

​And ... if you type "svnlite help" what happens?  The name of the command
is svnlite, not svn, so you may have to mentally swap the terms in terminal
messages.  :)​


-- 
Freddie Cash
fjwcash_at_gmail.com