On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Peter Wemm <peter_at_wemm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Antoine Brodin <antoine_at_freebsd.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andriy Gapon <avg_at_freebsd.org> wrote: > ... >> Hello, >> >> FWIW, I had a similar panic today on 9.2-RELEASE with a GENERIC kernel: >> panic: Bad entry start/end for new stack entry >> cpuid = 1 >> KDB: stack backtrace: >> #0 0xffffffff80947986 at kdb_backtrace+0x66 >> #1 0xffffffff8090d9ae at panic+0x1ce >> #2 0xffffffff80b81314 at vm_map_stack+0x274 >> #3 0xffffffff80b83584 at vm_mmap+0x674 >> #4 0xffffffff80b83d2f at sys_mmap+0x1cf >> #5 0xffffffff80cf187a at amd64_syscall+0x5ea >> #6 0xffffffff80cdbff7 at Xfast_syscall+0xf7 >> >> It looks like the box was compiling java related ports (java/jaxen and >> devel/antlr) when it panic'ed. > > This is troubling. I'm wondering what's changed and why we haven't > seen this before. > > Just so I'm clear, you're building 9.2 ports on a 9.2-REL kernel, > right? and not something like building 9.2-REL ports inside a jail on > a 10.x or 11.x host? 10.x / 11.x are not involved and you're seeing > this? This is 9.2-REL host and kernel. The only thing "new" is the ports tree, ports tree from 20 december didn't make the box panic while ports tree from 26 december does. (and there was an openjdk update between) Cheers, AntoineReceived on Thu Dec 26 2013 - 17:51:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:45 UTC