Hi, On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:07:23 -0800 Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > actual real-world conditions. In his words, FreeBSD should "eat its > own dogfood." The new installation on FreeBSD.org, of course, would I am on dog food since last May/June. How should I phrase it? Every can tastes different. Most cans have a perfect taste but some cans are really off. So, when I see a bad can, I go back to my old can, wait a day and get me then a new can. This is then - most likely - good again. This is the real reason why it is not possible to run important machines on dog food. If one can is bad, the machine is down. As FreeBSD.org sits next to the canning machine, it can run on dog food. ErichReceived on Sun Feb 10 2013 - 00:30:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:34 UTC