On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:58 AM, hiren panchasara <hiren.panchasara_at_gmail.com> wrote: > With revision=246484, it seems we have hit the limit. > At $WORK we have one more flag and to accommodate that we need to bump this up. > > Can p_flag be bumped up to u_long? > > Index: proc.h > =================================================================== > --- proc.h (revision 245937) > +++ proc.h (working copy) > _at__at_ -497,7 +497,7 _at__at_ > * The following don't make too much sense. > * See the td_ or ke_ versions of the same flags. > */ > - int p_flag; /* (c) P_* flags. */ > + u_long p_flag; /* (c) P_* flags. */ > enum { > PRS_NEW = 0, /* In creation */ > PRS_NORMAL, /* threads can be run. */ > > Thanks, > Hiren > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" I see at least two problems here: - The change you propose may result in a KBI breakage. - sizeof(unsigned long) == 4 on some archs, e.g. my i386 Atom, which makes the change uneffective. Thanks, DavideReceived on Sun Feb 17 2013 - 02:25:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:34 UTC