On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3_at_amdmi3.ru> wrote: > * Kimmo Paasiala (kpaasial_at_gmail.com) wrote: > >> Does the -fstack-protector option work on CLANG 3.1 and 3.2? >> >> There is thread on FreeBSD forums about the stack protector and ports >> and I'm wondering if it's possible to use the -fstack-protector option >> with CLANG. >> >> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=36927 > > You might be interested in this patch: > > https://github.com/AMDmi3/freebsd-ports-mk/compare/master...stack-protector > > afaik, in prior discussion some years ago an issue was mentioned that > some ports don't build with stack-protector, so I suggested to introduce > STACK_PROTECTOR_SAFE/_UNSAFE knobs similar to what we have for > MAKE_JOBS_SAFE_/_UNSAFE (we might actually only need > STACK_PROTECTOR_UNSAFE, as unlike MAKE_JOBS, build errors caused by > enabling stack protector are not transient, so we can have an exp-run > to just mark all uncompatible ports and consider all others compatible). > > If there's interest in this, I can refresh the patch and submit it. > Yes, this is very much what I had in mind. Please submit it :) -KimmoReceived on Sun Feb 17 2013 - 12:16:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:34 UTC