I'd be interested in the general policy on LINKS vs. SYMLINKS between directories that might end up on different file systems. There seems to be an assumption that system directories in /usr (e.g. /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /usr/libexec) are on the same file system, but I do not think that this assumption is documented. I'm using a ZFS only installation of -CURRENT and have separate file systems for several of the directories in / and /usr, that usually share a file system (e.g. /bin, /sbin, but also /usr/bin/, /usr/sbin and /usr/libexec are independent file systems). An older case is the link from /usr/bin/chgrp to /usr/sbin/chown (see usr.sbin/chown/Makefile), which is easily fixed by using a SMYLINK instead of a LINK. And now there is usr.sbin/bsdinstall/partedit/Makefile, which as of r244859 creates a link from /usr/libexec/bsdinstall to /usr/sbin/sade. This breaks with /usr/bin and /usr/sbin on different file systems, while it should not according to the commit message: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- r244859 | nwhitehorn | 2012-12-30 15:35:00 +0100 (Sun, 30 Dec 2012) | 7 lines Replace sade the extracted piece of sysinstall with sade the extracted piece of bsdinstall (although this time with a symlink instead of duplicated source code). Discussed on: freebsd-geom MFC after: 3 months ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The SYMLINK mentioned in the commit message is a LINK to a different directory, which might be on a different file system, actually. This should be fixed by the attached patch, to remove the implied assumption and to make the Makefile match the commit message. Regards, STefan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:33 UTC