Re: clang 3.2 RC2 miscompiles libgcc?

From: David Chisnall <theraven_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 16:51:11 +0000

On 6 Jan 2013, at 16:48, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:

> No. It's completely broken at all optimization levels. There do not
> appear to be any flags that change the behavior. Building unwind-dw2.c
> either with gcc or with the previous import of clang in our tree does
> fix it, however.

Do you have an LLVM PR# for this that I can follow?

David

Received on Sun Jan 06 2013 - 15:51:14 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: O. Hartmann: "Re: LLVM 3.2: official stable port is still LLVM 3.1. Basesystem missing important LLVM pieces!"
Previous message: David Chisnall: "Re: LLVM 3.2: official stable port is still LLVM 3.1. Basesystem missing important LLVM pieces!"
In reply to: Nathan Whitehorn: "Re: clang 3.2 RC2 miscompiles libgcc?"
Next in thread: Stefan Farfeleder: "Re: clang 3.2 RC2 miscompiles libgcc?"
Reply: Stefan Farfeleder: "Re: clang 3.2 RC2 miscompiles libgcc?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:33 UTC