On 2013-07-12 6:56, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Kevin Oberman <rkoberman_at_gmail.com> wrote > in > <CAN6yY1sRSWEMj2_bJX_DRZMxgk4tf50_ODe8O8i2d6wTrGW3ug_at_mail.gmail.com>: > > rk> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Mark Felder <feld_at_feld.me> wrote: > rk> > rk> > On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:44:12 -0500, Michael Grimm < > rk> > trashcan_at_odo.in-berlin.de> wrote: > rk> > > rk> > Will that patch make it into 9.2? If I am not mistaken, that > patch isn't > rk> >> in stable yet. > rk> >> > rk> > > rk> > I would also like to see this patch hit 9.x sooner than later. > It's so > rk> > painful when someone forgets to fix the alias numbering on > servers with > rk> > many, many IPv4 and IPv6 addresses... > rk> > > rk> > rk> Please, please, please, please, ...! > rk> > rk> Freeze is only two days away, so time for 9.2 is almost over and I > can see > rk> no good reason NOT to get this done. > > r252015 was merged to stable/9 today. Thanks! This is highly appreciated. A first glance at network.subr tells me that much more has been modified/simplified regarding alias definitions, great. Regards, MichaelReceived on Fri Jul 12 2013 - 04:52:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:39 UTC