Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > So, then did r251446 actually start using this value or did other > > values get significantly tuned up? I recall now setting this nearly > > a year ago when we did our ZFS tuning and it was a four fold increase > > on the defaults. > > r251446 optimized the wakeups by only doing wakeups when runningbufspace > actually crossed the lorunningspace. Before, wakeups were performed > always on the runningbufspace changes. > > For ZFS, these settings are completely irrelevant, ZFS does not use > buffer cache. A year is so long ago... It might have been tuning for our postgres servers. It might be worth while putting in a sanity check that doesn't allow hirunningspace to be set lower than lorunningspace. Thanks for your patience. Ian -- Ian FreislichReceived on Sat Jul 13 2013 - 15:29:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:39 UTC