On 24.07.2013 14:07, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:55:21PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> On 24.07.2013 13:34, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:22:57AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>>> Hi Pedro, >>>> >>>> Bapt tells me that there are FUSE issues in the most recent -HEAD and >>>> it's stopping poudriere from running. >>> Nah poudriere does not use yet fuse :) >>>> What's the story here? >>>> >>> I was about to mail you :) >>> >>> It is broken since r248084 apparently the update on the fuse_kernel.h you did is >>> not in sync with fusefs-libs, resulting in no filesystem to properly work. >>> >>> Do you have any insight on the reason of the changes? and I should look at? >> The change came from upstream. Does it help to revert it all? >> >> Another option could be to teach the port to use the kernel header >> but it doesn't look like that would work either :(. > Yes reverting will help r248084 is the last known working revision. I am perfectly OK with reverting, of course. > Updating the header should be done with modification on the code itself to > implement the missing bits. has some things has changed, I have seen some > interesting things https://github.com/bfleischer/fuse-macosx I might probably > have a look at it later. I see, there are least two macosx fuse forks but it appears they were merged into osxfuse. Things become rather confusing since we are using the linux fuse-libs with yet another header and NetBSD has a completely different implementation using puffs with librefuse/libperfuse. For now let's just fix things :). Pedro.Received on Wed Jul 24 2013 - 18:14:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:40:39 UTC